About the iPad

OK, first make the predictable two or three jokes, some cleverer than others. Get it out of your system, I can wait.
Now, what do I think of it? Well, I doubt I can afford one, and I’m not uneasy about that; by the time our finances stabilize, a great many other things will have settled down, too, including prices and apps and specs. If someone wants to donate one, I’ll gladly accept it and put it to work, but I’m not making puppy-dog faces at Margaret over iChat.
That being said, I can envision immediately what an iPad would mean for my daily routine. I look at the iPad and I see the main reason I haven’t been drawn into the Kindle world. An iPad will do more, better, in color — and it will do a very fine job of presenting books. And that’s the pulsing heart of such desire as I feel for one: as a recent immigrant to this thistl’d isle, I have had to leave a great proportion of my library behind (as I’ve said before). and I see in the iPad the device that could help me make the transition to digital reading. Most of what I read, I read in unattractive formats. Academic and technical books are generally published with minimal effort toward the selection of paper, ink, page design, illustration (if any), and so on. I would ecstatically trade all my bound copies of academic/technical works for digital copies. Please, make me the the offer. Please.
That doesn’t make me post-bibliophiliac. It does mean that I would select the bound books that I buy for their specific physical manifestations. I don’t want (only) digital versions of Edward Tufte’s books. I will continue buying various editions of the Greek New Testament, Bibles, and liturgical books (although digital editions of Ritual Notes, Fortescue, and A Priest’s Handbook would come in awfully handy). It does mean that book publishers will have to earn their bound-book sales, though at the same time they will be able to mass-market digital pulps. It means that bound-books will retain their value for the things that tangible books do best (archival copies, a centuries-old open format) and digital books will be able to flourish for the things they do best (convenience, portability, multimedia hybrid formats, perhaps some interactivity, low backlist storage costs, somewhat adjustable formatting (no separate large-type editions necessary, and machine-audio once the publishing industry recuperates from its cranio-rectal displacement disorder). All of this should be a very good thing for authors. Different, but very good.
And the super-good news, if Apple doesn’t ruin everything (and I don’t trust them not to), is that the iBook app rests on the open EPUB book format. I repeat my assertion/plea that this is the moment for some university press to lay claim to a huge untapped market share.
Plus the iPad will do much else beside present books — those other uses for which gadgeteers are slagging the current iteration of the iPad as “not good enough.” Word: if people play games, watch video, read and send email, and browse the web contentedly on smart phones (and they do — have you noticed?), they will do so all the more happily with an iPad. If the iPad is as blazingly fast as the people who handled it have suggested, all of these functions will work so smoothly that smartphones will again look as awkwardly clunky as did the monochrome dot-matrixed versions of those apps on early “web-ready” mobile phones. And come on, the bezel about which so many are griping serves the essential purpose of giving a margin for holding the unit. These aren’t flaws, they’re features.
Apple hasn’t played all its tablet cards yet. There’s an upgrade to the iPhone OS due in a short while that may well introduce limited multitasking. There’s plenty of opportunity for Apple design engineers to figure out what to do with a camera such that it fits functionally with the uses to which one might put a tablet (did people seriously imagine that someone might hold a legal-pad-sized item up in the air to take photos? Or that a webcam-like unit would work well with the positions and circumstances in which users will deploy iPads? There’s progress to be made on this front, but I think Apple is smart to wait and see how cameras fit into the emergent usage patterns for this new device). It’s going to get better.
So I’ve almost talked myself into lusting after one — I see a very strong case for the iPad as a note-taking, book-reading, video-watching, web- and mail-browsing mobile computing platform. That sounds like a huge winner to me. So I’m with Dave (except that he’ll own one before I will).

8 thoughts on “About the iPad

  1. I was thinking about the lack of a camera but you made me realize that it does not make sense to have one because of the very nature and style of the iPad. Thanks. I just love it and I will not rest until I get My hands on one of these beauties.

  2. I want to see one in the flesh to see if the handy size and programs I use are all there. If so, I may decide to “downsize” when the price stabilizes, i.e. probably in a year or two.

  3. No, not a puppy-dog face, Margaret — especially since I haven’t even seen one in the silicon (as it were). Just a positive assessment of its usefulness and an anticipation that today’s nay-sayers may be picking up the iPad at the wrong end. So to speak.

  4. The timing couldn’t have been better, but alas the feature set doesn’t give me what I need. I need a wifi unit with an HDMI output to drive the basic 1920 x 1080 big screen teevee so I can watch hulu on something better than my monitor. I guess I could move the Dell XPS tower into the living room, but think of the crowding and the clutter not to mention the loss of a powerful computer in my office.

    When this “need” surfaced, I was optimistic that the Apple tablet would suit. My Asus notebook doesn’t have HDMI, my laptop doesn’t have HDMI, and I’m sure not going to buy a new notebook for the single function. No, I think I’ll have to wait for iPad 2.0 (or 3.0?) I’m looking forward to getting into the iPhone feature set on something big enough to handle and networkable enough not to require an AT&T contract. But wait! There’s less! It seems the iPad DOES require an AT&T contract so it would cost me an extra US$30 a month to drive one from my own living room. Or would I be able to use my 802.11(x) in the house with my existing access point?

    Why is everything so complicated?

  5. Man, you’re telling me, Frank. I’d like a media computer, just a simple Mac Mini or equivalent, not even the latest model. They keep making the entry level Mac Mini better and more expensive, though, so even though a much earlier, more basic one would suit, I’m left looking in the shop window rather than scooping up a bargain basement one.
    And Scotland seems not to have caught on to the benefits of Craigslist. Some time for chuckles you can visit the Craigslist Glasgow site, and listen to the links rust.

  6. my problem is that while i love the idea of a clear, colorful, eye-friendly digital reader, if i can’t pen on-screen annotations it takes me out of some good reading habits i have developed over the years. even digital content needs to be tactile to me. also your point about university press is dead on. it’s a waste for me unless i can get those titles that are less than popular in that format, otherwise i am wasting money i can spend in the amazon marketplace – which i tend to do anyway… i hope sony is paying attention to this so they can drop something with these features soon.

  7. i found a routledge title on kindle! one, but it’s a start, and i can read it on my netbook and all the computers i frequent, for a reasonable price–something not easily done for renaissance theory. so, it’s coming.

Comments are closed.