I’m not playing BlogShares (and all my retirement funds are in a lump where TIAA-CREF puts money from financial know-nothings as opposed to daring, entrepreneurial types who have to manage their own pensions), but I’m vain enough to be flattered that my stock has performed adequately. The problem is that all the value of AKMA’s Random Ltd. is locked up in my old blog address, whereas any future enhancement of my value will depend on developments here at the Disseminary address. So I advise anyone with a hypothetical financial interest in my blog to call attention to what was merely a change of corporate address. If necessary, you can make the case that AKMA’s Random is merely a holding company for all the addresses that have been associated with this digital literary endeavor: the dusty old Seabury address, the sturdier Seabury-Moveable Type address, the transitional “sabren” address at Cornerhost, and the new, firm, Disseminary address.
Posted by AKMA at April 11, 2003 10:31 AM | TrackBackIf you become a player, you can assert ownership of the two blogs and merge them. Ask if you need help; it's a minor inconvenience, but not a big deal.
Posted by: Dorothea Salo at April 11, 2003 10:39 AMYour going to give away my plan to make money on blogshares. I've been waiting for the new disseminary address to become listed for trading, then I will buy it when it is at $0.01 and then sell it when it gets more expencive. I've been checking it every day, still not listed.
Of course this is my only plan to make money in the game, so I have a feeling I'm not going to do so hot.
When the machine compiles your code, however, it does a little bit of translation. At run time, the computer sees nothing but 1s and 0s, which is all the computer ever sees: a continuous string of binary numbers that it can interpret in various ways.
Posted by: Pierce at January 12, 2004 10:47 PMTo address this issue, we turn to the second place to put variables, which is called the Heap. If you think of the Stack as a high-rise apartment building somewhere, variables as tenets and each level building atop the one before it, then the Heap is the suburban sprawl, every citizen finding a space for herself, each lot a different size and locations that can't be readily predictable. For all the simplicity offered by the Stack, the Heap seems positively chaotic, but the reality is that each just obeys its own rules.
Posted by: Rebecca at January 12, 2004 10:48 PMSeth Roby graduated in May of 2003 with a double major in English and Computer Science, the Macintosh part of a three-person Macintosh, Linux, and Windows graduating triumvirate.
Posted by: Thomasina at January 12, 2004 10:48 PMThe Stack is just what it sounds like: a tower of things that starts at the bottom and builds upward as it goes. In our case, the things in the stack are called "Stack Frames" or just "frames". We start with one stack frame at the very bottom, and we build up from there.
Posted by: Joyce at January 13, 2004 10:39 AMWhen the machine compiles your code, however, it does a little bit of translation. At run time, the computer sees nothing but 1s and 0s, which is all the computer ever sees: a continuous string of binary numbers that it can interpret in various ways.
Posted by: Valentine at January 13, 2004 10:40 AMFor this program, it was a bit of overkill. It's a lot of overkill, actually. There's usually no need to store integers in the Heap, unless you're making a whole lot of them. But even in this simpler form, it gives us a little bit more flexibility than we had before, in that we can create and destroy variables as we need, without having to worry about the Stack. It also demonstrates a new variable type, the pointer, which you will use extensively throughout your programming. And it is a pattern that is ubiquitous in Cocoa, so it is a pattern you will need to understand, even though Cocoa makes it much more transparent than it is here.
Posted by: Alan at January 13, 2004 10:40 AM