On my way to and from Oak Brook (which will now proudly append to its name the epithet, “Home of the Action-Packed 166th Convention of the Diocese of Chicago”), I had the opportunity to peruse a great many billboards along Interstate 294. I’ve commented on one before; the ones that impressed me today were a series of signs indicating that women just go wild for inexpensive, insipid American beers such as Budweiser, Bud Lite, and Michelob.
Now, I’m not proposing my antiquarian singles years provide an adequate basis for assessing women’s attraction to cheap beer, but certainly nothing in those years, or after, would have prepared me to think that I could enhance my status with models and starlets by offering them Budweiser. All the beer-drinking women I know prefer more refined brews — imports, or microbrewed locals, for instance. (Margaret doesn’t like beer.)
Would my life as an undergraduate (before I met Margaret) have been entirely different if I’d walked up to the most breathtakingly beautiful woman at a bar somewhere, and asked her, “May I buy you a mug of the cheapest brew they sell here? Or its Lite version?” Accordion Guy may be able to help me on this. I hope his birthday party is more exciting than my Diocesan Convention, but convention would be pretty hard to top for thrills, even if Accordion Guy has the Hot Tub On Wheels.
Posted by AKMA at November 8, 2003 09:21 PM | TrackBackWhen I occasionally indulge, I prefer a nice stout. Guinness is always good. Lite beer? feh. If you're going to have alcohol, it might as well *taste* like something other than icky flavored water. But then, I often don't fit into female generalisations, especially ones to do with the marketing of commercial products. ;-) I'm also not a model nor a starlet.
Posted by: ARJ at November 9, 2003 08:49 PMGuinness. Heineken.
on tap, preferably.
no contest. no others. no "icky flavored water" (it's just a great quote).
In England women are now allowed to drink beer. The battleground remains in the area of whether it is seemly for a woman to be given a pint glass: most women over 30 would not be seen with anything more than the female half-pint; a glass of different proportions from the male half-pint which is simly a scaled-down pint glass.
However, Nestle market a chocolate bar here called Yorkie and all its sales pitch is devoted to the notion that it is chocolate for men. The wrapper has a "roadsign" No-Women image and the strapline "Do Not Feed the Birds".... The TV ads are all truckers and builders.... Need I tell you any more?
Posted by: David Gutteridge at November 17, 2003 04:20 AMOur next line looks familiar, except it starts with an asterisk. Again, we're using the star operator, and noting that this variable we're working with is a pointer. If we didn't, the computer would try to put the results of the right hand side of this statement (which evaluates to 6) into the pointer, overriding the value we need in the pointer, which is an address. This way, the computer knows to put the data not in the pointer, but into the place the pointer points to, which is in the Heap. So after this line, our int is living happily in the Heap, storing a value of 6, and our pointer tells us where that data is living.
Posted by: Dolora at January 13, 2004 01:11 AMWhen a variable is finished with it's work, it does not go into retirement, and it is never mentioned again. Variables simply cease to exist, and the thirty-two bits of data that they held is released, so that some other variable may later use them.
Posted by: Tristram at January 13, 2004 01:11 AMThis will allow us to use a few functions we didn't have access to before. These lines are still a mystery for now, but we'll explain them soon. Now we'll start working within the main function, where favoriteNumber is declared and used. The first thing we need to do is change how we declare the variable. Instead of
Posted by: Nicholas at January 13, 2004 01:11 AMSeth Roby graduated in May of 2003 with a double major in English and Computer Science, the Macintosh part of a three-person Macintosh, Linux, and Windows graduating triumvirate.
Posted by: Pompey at January 13, 2004 09:48 AMTo address this issue, we turn to the second place to put variables, which is called the Heap. If you think of the Stack as a high-rise apartment building somewhere, variables as tenets and each level building atop the one before it, then the Heap is the suburban sprawl, every citizen finding a space for herself, each lot a different size and locations that can't be readily predictable. For all the simplicity offered by the Stack, the Heap seems positively chaotic, but the reality is that each just obeys its own rules.
Posted by: Griffith at January 13, 2004 09:49 AMThis variable is then used in various lines of code, holding values given it by variable assignments along the way. In the course of its life, a variable can hold any number of variables and be used in any number of different ways. This flexibility is built on the precept we just learned: a variable is really just a block of bits, and those bits can hold whatever data the program needs to remember. They can hold enough data to remember an integer from as low as -2,147,483,647 up to 2,147,483,647 (one less than plus or minus 2^31). They can remember one character of writing. They can keep a decimal number with a huge amount of precision and a giant range. They can hold a time accurate to the second in a range of centuries. A few bits is not to be scoffed at.
Posted by: Alice at January 13, 2004 09:50 AM