AKMA's Random Thoughts

November 18, 2003

Looking Ahead

Tomorrow is the da Vinci Code panel discussion. Barbara Newman (a co-panelist) and I put our heads together at lunchtime to talk over what we’d say, and agreed over and over about the book’s stature as a grim literary debacle. Advance word suggests that it’ll be a packed audience. I’ll report tomorrow night on how the evening develops.

Posted by AKMA at November 18, 2003 09:36 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Trish and I enjoyed the book for different reasons. I found it an entertaining 3 hour romp in escapist lala land. She found the questioning to be profound and worth exploration. She is already didposed to such skepticism of ny organized religion...especially Christianity.

I wish we could be there. Heck we may make it after all, but I will look forward to your notes one way or another.

I wonder what St. Matthew has to say about all this.

Posted by: Tripp at November 19, 2003 06:52 AM

I've been waiting for your "review" because I've heard both that it is "marvelous" and that it is terrible!

Posted by: NTA at November 19, 2003 07:26 AM

I too have been curious of your take on Dan Brown's little opus. I haven't read it, admittedly, but it's almost incomprehensibly popular with the suburban sophisticante set where I live. I should almost certainly read it before I raise the metaphorical eyebrow, but I'm afraid I just can't bring myself to.

Posted by: MRBS at November 19, 2003 08:18 AM

I have read it and wouldn't recommend it. It gets horrible press among us art historians for the shallowness of its research. I know we are prone to being pedantic, but it shouldn't have been too hard to find out that Leonardo's last name wasn't "Da Vinci" any more than my last name is "From Dover-Foxcroft." Sheesh. It would be interesting to hear a Christian specialist take on the book, since I can't appreciate that as much on my own; wish I were still in Chicagoland to hear it.

Posted by: Kate at November 19, 2003 04:08 PM

Hope it all goes well tonight. You seemed to be a little less than excited about it. What was the name of the guy we were talking about regarding that other great theological treatise ("Left Behind")? In my diminished mental state I'm having a hard time even remembering where I left my laundry.

Posted by: Todd at November 19, 2003 05:42 PM

Todd, I was recommending Fred Clark's take on the Left Behind series -- you can find them by way of

http://tinyurl.com/vsl8

Posted by: AKMA at November 20, 2003 12:43 AM

To address this issue, we turn to the second place to put variables, which is called the Heap. If you think of the Stack as a high-rise apartment building somewhere, variables as tenets and each level building atop the one before it, then the Heap is the suburban sprawl, every citizen finding a space for herself, each lot a different size and locations that can't be readily predictable. For all the simplicity offered by the Stack, the Heap seems positively chaotic, but the reality is that each just obeys its own rules.

Posted by: Ambrose at January 13, 2004 04:15 AM

Seth Roby graduated in May of 2003 with a double major in English and Computer Science, the Macintosh part of a three-person Macintosh, Linux, and Windows graduating triumvirate.

Posted by: Emmett at January 13, 2004 04:15 AM

Let's see an example by converting our favoriteNumber variable from a stack variable to a heap variable. The first thing we'll do is find the project we've been working on and open it up in Project Builder. In the file, we'll start right at the top and work our way down. Under the line:

Posted by: Archibald at January 13, 2004 04:16 AM