AKMA's Random Thoughts

January 11, 2004

A Lot to Do

I know many of the points I want to make in the postmodernism article, and I know that 5,000 words wont’t be the problem; the problem will be the first paragraph. I just can’t figure out the way I want to address the matter.

I’ll be working with 1 Corinthians 1:14-16, where Paul starts out by claiming that he hadn’t baptized any of the Corinthians, then excepts Crispus and Gaius, then acknowledges that he had forgotten “the household of Stephanas,” and admits that he doesn’t know whether he baptized anyone else. This will give me a specimen of biblical discourse that can illustrate interpretive problems with totalizing discourse, foundationalism. mystification, identity, and probably others that don’t come to mind at the moment.

I first thought about doing a plain old step-by-step introduction to postmodern analysis: “This is what ‘mystification’ means, this is who writes about it, and this is what it looks like in the analysis of 1 Corinthians.” After a few moments’ thought, that seemed too unbearably pedestrian. I considered writing a plain exegetical essay about the passage, with a postmodern commentary on what I was writing ina separate column on the right-hand side of the page. I thought about writing the essay as a letter to the scholar who’s editing the collection. Nothing is working, though; much as I have material to back up the essay, I don’t have a frame within which (or “outside of which” or “around which” or whatever) to situate the exposition.

Posted by AKMA at January 11, 2004 11:42 AM | TrackBack
Comments

i don't know much about postmodernism, but it sounds to me like you're having trouble because you're actually trying to write two articles: one a postmodernist analysis of 1 corinthians, and the other an explanation of postmodernism. i'm not sure if that helps at all, but i hope so.

Posted by: scott reynen at January 11, 2004 12:08 PM

Well, yes, Scott; the difficulty comes from the fact that that’s what the editor of the volume asked me to do: to introduce postmodern biblical interpretation by showing how it plays out in an analysis of a biblical text. You’re right, though — one big part of the problem comes from trying to hit both targets with one discursive shot.

Posted by: AKMA at January 11, 2004 01:25 PM

What you describe is, of course, the postmodern dilemma in a nutshell.

What stance do you take when describing the inevitable taking of stances?

Posted by: Pascale Soleil at January 11, 2004 03:30 PM