The Syllabus of My Imagination

Every now and then I muse about the required reading for a seminar in the sort of rhetorical/pragmatic/semiological hermeneutics I advocate. This morning, the reading list would include

 
And, of course, sundry things that I’ve written. Sorry that some of these items are so expensive.
 
What have I left out? Some of you know me well enough to be able to remind me.
 

14 comments / Add your comment below

  1. What, no Blanchot (e.g. The Writing of the Disaster) or Deleuze’s Logic of Sense? The list has a lot of the ‘classics’ which generally bodes well.

  2. Christopher, I came by Deleuze after I was already pretty well tracked, so he didn’t come to mind as immediately — but that’s right. And I must confess to being innocent of Blanchot, so now I have something more to chew on.

  3. @Judy: As many as it takes!
     
    @Laura: It’s a classic, a real landmark — it started a series of intense arguments among comics authors.
     
    Plus, Margaret remembered that I should include
     
    Jane Tompkins, ‘Indians: Texualism, Morality, and the Problem of History’
     
    Terry Castle, ‘Contagious Folly: An Adventure and its Skeptics’ (also in Questions of Evidence a terrific book as well)
     
    and Henry Louis Gates, ‘“Authenticity’, Or The Lesson of Little Tree
     
    [Later: G. E. M. Anscombe, Intention]
     

  4. Along with all the other things I am reading right now, I started Augustine, De Doctrina Christiana books 1 & 2. In the light of what I have read in modern / post-modern hermeneutics, phenomenology, and existentialism, I clearly read Augustine with some non-traditional lenses. For example, folks in Grand Rapids Michigan love to quote Augustine as their source for Calvinistic / western thought.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *