Dinosaurs Protest Mammalian Ascendancy

The news outlets are picking up on a report from the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry that bemoans, yet again, the extent to which people use the internet for transmitting data — in particular, for transmitting digital versions of music recordings without the permission of the record companies. We’ve been ’round this bush a million times before, so let’s note by title (as it were) several features of this tendentious reproduction of the industry’s perspective.
The article cites industry sources repeatedly and verbatim, and summarizes their perspective, while only alluding vaguely to a contrary outlook. The article reproduces the biased vocabulary of the industry (“piracy”) rather than steering toward more even-handed vocabulary; the only time the article uses “file-sharing,” it quotes the phrase from an industry spokesperson who appends the modifier “illegal” to it. (“Piracy” and “file-sharing” are different phenomena, as the British couple whose lives hang in the balance can testify.) The statistics to which the article refers should be questioned, as in virtually every other case when the recording industry has generated estimates of their losses to file-sharing, the figures have rested on very tenuous assumptions about human behaviour. And the article insulates the industry from the pertinent criticism: that it has repeatedly failed to embrace a changing technological environment for what it makes possible, and adapt their business models to accommodate reality. Instead, they try to institute the legal perpetuation of the ephemeral state of affairs that began about a hundred years ago, and will end pretty much as soon as governing cultures allow it to.
I’m in favor of musicians making money, and I’m in favor of the internet doing what it does best (i.e., transmit data). If that means that the specific ways that musicians earn money has to change, that should be a no-brainer — not a basis for legislation that forestalls adaptation to changing circumstances.

2 thoughts on “Dinosaurs Protest Mammalian Ascendancy

  1. It doesn’t help that the record industry goes after people who plainly *can’t afford* the massive bills they hand out. It doesn’t exactly make them sympathetic. Instead, it just makes them look desperate and greedy.

    And anyway, there’s been plenty musicians who have complained about the behaviour of the record industry also — mostly because the industry pockets the money with very little going to the artist. You want to make money as an artist? Go do some gigs, they’re where the real money is at. Mass-produced recordings? Not so much.

  2. The recording industry has had an issue with radio for the same reason. They used to say that radio recording would destroy the industry. Given the recent supreme court ruling that would allow the industry to essentially buy politicians I’m sure they will soon be getting their anti-piracy laws past.

    Would you mind if I linked to your blog. I find this post particularly interesting and would like to share with my readers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *